The days of clutching plastic-foam cups in New York City are numbered.
The
city on Thursday became the latest in the U.S. to ban such containers
for food and drinks, completing an initiative begun during the Bloomberg
administration. Environmental advocates applauded the move, but others
questioned the scope of its benefit.
The new law, which also
eliminates the loose packing materials known as “peanuts,” will take
effect July 1. Other cities such as San Francisco, Seattle and
Washington, have passed similar bans on the once-ubiquitous cups and
takeout clamshells.
Environmentalists noted that the lightweight
plastic foam, known as expanded polystyrene, breaks easily, clogging
waterways and posing a threat to marine life. A coffee cup used for 20
minutes, they said, can take decades to degrade—if not longer, lingering
in landfills. In processing facilities, the dirty food containers are
difficult to clean, while the market to buy and recycle the product,
they say, remains uncertain.
“This is an important and
encouraging step,” said
Eric Goldstein,
New York City environment director for the Natural Resources
Defense Council. “There’s a growing recognition that they cause
disproportionate environmental and pollution problems and there are
readily available substitutes. And so why not make the change?”
The
decision completes a yearlong analysis by the city’s sanitation
department of whether there was an effective way to recycle the
materials, as required by a law passed in December 2013. Their answer?
No.
“It did not make environmental sense to try and separate it
out because there’s no place to sell it,” said sanitation department
Commissioner
Kathryn Garcia.
That assertion was vigorously contested by Dart Container
Corp., which negotiated with the city in a failed effort to prevent the
ban.
“I’m baffled and disappointed,” said
Michael Westerfield,
corporate director of recycling at Dart, which is the largest producer of foam cups in the world.
Mr.
Westerfield noted that the city’s ban doesn’t cover all expanded
polystyrene products, including egg cartons and packing materials used
for fragile electronics like for televisions. The city estimates the ban
will capture about 90% of expanded polystyrene in the city.
The
ban also doesn’t address the annual 30,000 tons of rigid
polystyrene—the hard plastic found in items like some yogurt containers
and CD cases—generated by New Yorkers that will continue to be dumped in
landfills.
Dart offered to cover the costs of infrastructure
needed to sort both kinds of polystyrene products and guaranteed a
market for the materials for five years, city officials and Mr.
Westerfield agree.
“They’re spinning like it’s a win,” Mr. Westerfield said. “Well, it’s not.”
“I
thought it was silly,” said
Nickolas J. Themelis,
director of the Earth Engineering Center at Columbia University,
noting that expanded polystyrene products are a fraction of the city’s
curbside waste stream (0.79%, according to city data).
“It’s
touching a small part of the whole problem,” said Mr. Themelis, who has
done studies on other topics funded by the American Chemistry Council,
which lobbied against the ban.
Foam’s airiness and insulating
ability means that less material can be used, he said. For instance, it
doesn’t require additional protective heating sleeves like some paper
coffee cups.
City officials said they were skeptical that the
polystyrene would be recycled into new products and that they would be
stuck once Dart’s five-year guarantee expired.
Changing the
recycling habits of the city’s 8.4 million inhabitants is “a big lift
and we want to make sure we have a very clear message before we go out
and make that change,” said Ms. Garcia, the sanitation department
commissioner.
Many restaurants have already stopped using plastic foam for takeout containers. But for some, the habit is hard to break.
At
Fisherman’s Cove, a tiny Caribbean carryout restaurant in Crown
Heights, oxtail, jerk chicken and roti dishes are served almost
exclusively in foam containers.
“It’s going to be a difficult
task. We’re going to have to restructure how we do everything and it’s
going to take money,” said cook
Andrew Smith.
Plastic foam costs between 50 to 70 cents per container,
while replacements can cost $1.30 to $1.50, estimated the New York State
Restaurant Association, which supported the legislation after
exceptions were made for small businesses.
Nonprofits and small
businesses that have less than $500,000 in annual revenue can receive a
financial-hardship exemption if they prove the cost of the switch is too
expensive.
“People care more now about sustainability,” said
the restaurant association’s New York City director
Chris Hickey.
With the hardship exemption, “we’re taking care of the people
that can’t afford it, but at the same time we’re taking care of the
environment.” Write to Sophia Hollander at sophia.hollander@wsj.com
Polystyrene foam – commonly, but not always correctly referred to by the brand name Styrofoam — is cheap, strong and light and used in everything from consumer goods packaging to take-out food containers.
And it's increasingly unwelcome in communities across the USA.
The
New York City Council last week passed a ban on polystyrene foam food
containers, as well as the sale of loose polystyrene foam "peanuts" used
in packing. Both go into effect July 1, 2015. Albany County, N.Y.,
passed a law in November banning use of polystyrene foam food
containers, joining the ranks of such cities as Portland, Ore.; San
Francisco; Seattle; and Amherst, Mass.
Washington, D.C., Mayor Vincent Gray is proposing a ban there.
"Some
businesses ... are already phasing it out. It's a matter of pushing it,
making it a policy," said Chicago Alderman George Cardenas, who is
co-sponsor of legislation introduced earlier this month that would ban
the sale of polystyrene food packaging in the Windy City. "It's not
eco-friendly, if you will. This is just something that needs to be
done."
The bans are the result of decades-long campaigns by
environmental advocates, said Andrew Moesel, a spokesman with the New
York State Restaurant Association: "Styrofoam is a useful material. It
maintains heat. It's cost effective. But the fact is, it's not very good
for the environment."
Technically, Styrofoam is a trademarked
polystyrene product of Dow Chemical used in such applications as
building insulation and craft products, not in food containers.
For
foes of polystyrene foam food containers, its problems are numerous.
"Polystyrene foam doesn't break down easily, and it's easily dispersed
by the wind," creating a litter problem in streets and local waterways,
said Garth Schultz, city operations and environmental services manager
for El Cerrito, Calif., where a ban will go into effect Jan. 1.
Aside
from the litter problem, Albany County Executive Daniel McCoy pointed
to concerns about the health affects of the chemicals that make up
extruded polystyrene foam in justifying the ban. "You get takeout, the
steam melts that lid," he said. "It's going into your food. Eventually,
you're going to get sick from it."
Opponents of such bans, such as
the American Chemistry Council, have been pushing for communitywide
polystyrene recycling programs in places like New York City as an
alternative to proposed bans there.
Restaurants themselves are
increasingly turning a cold shoulder to polystyrene foam food
containers. Fast-food titan McDonald's Corp. announced in September it
would phase out foam cups at its 14,000 U.S. restaurants in favor of
paper cups in coming months. It quit using polystyrene clamshell
containers for burgers in 1990.
And Dunkin' Brands Group, the
parent company of the Dunkin' Donuts and Baskin-Robins chains, said in
its most-recent corporate social responsibility report that it is
rolling out an in-store foam cup recycling program at all its locations,
but that it hopes to introduce an alternative cup within two to three
years.
Moesel said the restaurant industry "generally likes to be
on the cutting edge of environmental protection, make it more green. But
(alternatives) have to be affordable. Our concern has always been the
bottom line, especially with mom-and-pop and ethnic-type restaurants. If
you're running a small Chinese restaurant, you can run through 500
cartons a day."
Brookline, Mass., which started a ban on
polystyrene foam food containers and disposable plastic store bags in
November, has so far handed out more than 50 waivers to affected
businesses as they look for workable alternatives and work through the
stock they have on hand, said Alan Balsam, director of public health and
human services
Starting next month, the town will probably start
issuing warnings. "Ultimately, we'll fine people, (but) we don't want to
hurt anybody's business," Balsam said. "With the (town's) trans fat
ban, after the waivers expired, people complied. I think the same will
happen here."
Moesel said that as more major communities such as
New York City change over, "that will have an impact on the marketplace.
That hopefully will ultimately drive down the price of alternatives. We
believe this is the future."
Daneman also reports for the Rochester (N.Y.) Democrat and Chronicle